MiFID II

Increasing transparency and strengthening investor protection

The second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) and the associated Regulation (MiFIR) came into effect across the EU on January 3, 2018 (replacing MiFID from 2007). When it was introduced, MiFID II was one of the broadest pieces of financial regulation since the 2008 financial crisis, covering most of the financial services industry.

Its overall objective is to strengthen investor protection through increased transparency and reporting, enhanced governance rules and heightened regulation of markets. The regulatory text itself consists of both a Directive and Regulation, as well as myriad Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS), Implementing Technical Standards and Delegated Acts.

Consultation papers and proposals from ESMA in late 2021 suggest updates to the pre- and post-trade transparency requirements, and potential changes to Best Execution Reporting. There is also the beginning of post-Brexit regulatory divergence (currently the EU and UK regulations are equivalent) to contend with, meaning MiFID II will remain a key compliance issues for firms.

IMPACT

The sheer size of this regulation, combined with the clarifications and guidance that continues to be published by ESMA, means total compliance remains an issue for many firms, as evidenced by the latest data from ESMA on sanctions and measures imposed by National Competent Authorities (NCAs). Some of the key areas of the MiFID II framework still prove particularly challenging for firms include Transaction Reporting, Best Execution, Record Keeping and Trade Reconstruction and are detailed below.

Transaction Reporting

While transaction reporting requirements existed under MiFID I, the scope and overall intention of the transaction reporting framework was greatly increased when MiFID II was introduced. The obligation to report transactions under MiFIR requires investment firms that execute transactions in financial instruments to report complete and accurate details of such transactions to a NCA - the FCA in the UK - as quickly as possible, and no later than the close of the following working day. Transaction reporting data is then used by the FCA and other regulators to detect and investigate suspected market abuse, as well as to conduct supervision and to support the work of other regulatory authorities (such as the Bank of England).

Note – transaction reporting is separate to trade reporting, a MiFID requirement for firms to report basic trade data to the market on a near real-time basis, and is the subject of reviews of RTS 1 and 2.

Changes to transaction reporting introduced by MiFID II:

Instruments covered – all security derivatives and cash equities are now in scope of reporting.
Type of transaction – no longer covering only market-side trades, the definition of ‘transaction’ now covers any purchase or sale of a reportable financial instrument, entering or closing a derivative contract in a financial instrument, and any change in notional amount of that contract. There are also some specific exclusions that do not require reporting, which only increases the overhead in reporting correctly.

Reporting responsibility – depending on a firm’s counterparty, the responsibility for reporting a transaction will fall on one or both parties, requiring sharing of trade information between firms.
Data reported – 65 pieces of data are required to be reported per transaction (only 13 of which were used in MiFID I), and range from basic economic information, to detailed data on the instrument itself, the trader or even the algorithm involved in the execution.
Timelines and mechanisms – reports must be made via an Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM) and by no later than the end of day the following day (T+1).

SteelEye’s award winning MiFID II Transaction Reporting Solution seamlessly captures, normalises and enriches all of a firm's required data, before automatically compiling the daily transaction reports, ready to be sent to an ARM at the click of a button.

Best Execution

Under MiFID II, firms are expected to take ‘all sufficient steps’ to achieve the best possible results for their clients. When executing a client order, firms are expected to consider “price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, size, nature or any other relevant consideration”.

As well as the required policies and procedures a firm must have in place to ensure these outcomes are reached, MiFID II requires firms to disclose far more information to demonstrate the quality of, and compliance with, its best execution responsibilities. Best Execution reports include:

Assessments of the execution quality obtained on different execution venues as defined in RTS 27. Reports must be published on a quarterly basis (no later than 3 months after the end of each quarter) and include data for each trading day.
Top 5 execution venues by volume, broken down by instrument class as defined in RTS 28. Reports must be published annually.
Execution venues must also publish a summary of the quality of their execution on a quarterly basis.

SteelEye’s asset class agnostic Best Execution solution enables firms to effortlessly meet their RTS 27 and RTS 28 reporting requirements and carry out continuous Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) to prove best execution and improve trading performance.

LEARN MORE ABOUT STEELEYE'S BEST EXECUTION AND TCA

Record Keeping & Trade Reconstruction

To ensure that financial firms can demonstrate compliance with the MiFID II rules, there are requirements for them to store extensive and detailed records of their transaction, documents, and communications. The scope of the records that need to be kept significantly increased when MiFID II was introduced and includes:

every client order received (regardless of whether the transaction was completed)
every ‘decision to deal’
complete transaction records

Importantly, the scope of MiFID II's record keeping requirements extends to telephone conversations, emails, instant messages and meeting notes which relate to transactions or client orders.

All of these records must be kept in a ‘readily accessible’ medium, in a Write-Once-Read-Many (WORM) format, for a minimum of 5 years.

This is all so the relevant NCA can access and review records as and when requested.

In practice, a firm may be asked at any point to provide all the records that relate to a particular trade or client order. The firm would then be expected to ‘reconstruct’ the trade, bringing together all the transaction/order details, conversations, emails, meeting minutes and more.

Given the typical deadline for completing a reconstruction is 72 hours after a request is made, the ability to access, identify and connect different records across different data formats is a significant challenge for most firms.

SteelEye’s SteelEye Data Platform consolidates, normalises and indexes all trade, order, communication, market and reference data on a single platform. With all data in one place, record keeping is effortless, trade reconstruction is instant and firms gain new insight into their performance.

SteelEye Holistic Trade and Communications Surveillance

Holistic surveillance solution that delivers simple, effective and efficient supervisory controls. The platform brings together multidimensional data on a single, flexible platform with rich reporting, automated workflows and analytics that identify suspicious activity, quickly.

Learn more

MiFID II Resources

Working out the full implications of MiFID II continues to be a pressing issue for many firms

SteelEye reduces the complexity and cost of financial compliance and provides firms with automated and optimised solutions for Record Keeping/Trade Reconstruction, Transaction Reporting and Best Execution. Book a demo to learn more about how SteelEye can help you Comply Smarter™.